Token intelligence for Robinhood Chain
A candle tells you what price did. Sherwood Insights reads what it cannot: who holds a token, how those wallets are linked, where they have sold before, and what the contract can still do to you. Every finding carries the evidence that produced it.
Two views of the same token
A price series is the last thing to know about a token, because it is the only thing everyone already knows. The signal is in the wallets underneath it.
Up and to the right. Nothing on this surface says who is buying, or whether the people already in are about to leave.
The same line, with the wallets and the contract laid over it. Each note is a computed metric, with the evidence that produced it one hover away.
What a chart cannot compute
Each one is computed from the chain at scan time, from transfer history and contract state, never from a vendor snapshot. The number and the evidence travel together.
01 / 06
Wallets that never transacted with each other but were funded by the same address are drawn as a dashed link and counted as one entity. The chart sees eleven buyers. The map sees one.
Top-10 share counted twice: once by address, once with linked wallets folded into one holder. The gap between the two bars is how much control the raw number was hiding.
Up to 300 top holders profiled from their own history: entry price, current multiple, and the multiple at which they trimmed last time. Then the share of supply now sitting past that point.
What this token's crowd also holds, ranked by wallet count and paired with lift against the whole chain. On ARROW, DIH tops the list with 73 wallets but only 3.6× lift. NVDA sits lower at 45 wallets and 41.7× lift. The second one is the finding.
Where this crowd's positions sit, drawn twice: by count and by dollars. On ARROW the median position is a $565k token, but 43% of their money sits above $250M. ARROW is at the 91st percentile by count and the 17th by dollars. A count-only chart implies the opposite conclusion.
Admin powers, residual authority, live taxes, proxy slots, self-destruct opcodes and a simulated sell path, all read from the chain. UP scored 90/A under a vendor feed that had no data for it. The local audit scores it 2/F: mintable through a live minter role while ownership is nominally renounced, with top-10 entities holding 97%.
How a scan runs
A scan pulls identity, contract state, holders, transfers, price and behaviour before the page is usable. The veil stays blurred rather than opaque, so you watch the panels assemble underneath.
Evidence, not vibes
Optionally, Claude narrates the computed metrics. Only the metrics. Each claim points at the id that produced it, and it will not tell you to buy or sell.
Ownership is nominally renounced owner_renounced but a live minter role remains minter_live, so supply can still be expanded by a party the renounce did not remove.
Concentration is severe once linked wallets are folded together: the top ten entities hold 97% of supply top10_entity, against a much lower raw address figure top10_raw.
Transfers to the pool are not blocked sell_path_clear. Whether this deployer has shipped honeypots before was not assessed deployer_history: unknown.
Start with any address
Runs locally on public endpoints with no keys. Add an Anthropic key and the AI read turns on.